Discussions from the magazine, website and social media
We've had some great feedback on last issue's Endpoint on teacher training by Vanessa Kind.
Alan Crooks wrote:
I can only agree. For example, I can recall from my time in research a PhD student with a first class Honours degree in physics coming to work in the lab. She didn't know how to make a 1 molar solution!
Duncan Armour joined in the debate:
There are lots of issues. For example, twenty years ago when I did my degree the number of students gaining a first class degree on each course was far fewer than would today. So as the current system now provides bursaries based on the class of first degree awarded, older potential teachers are discriminated against as they are far less likely to have got a first. And yet these experienced people are exactly who we should be desperate to attract into teaching.
Is it acceptable for a non-chemist to teach chemistry or indeed a non-physicist to teach physics? The reality is that I can't believe that it makes much difference at GCSE. There are good conversion courses available which address many of the concerns raised in the article. Clearly at A-level though there are real risks for the non-specialist. I have however met a number of very fine teachers who can turn their hand to chemistry and do it very well despite it not being their degree subject.
Finally, Catherine Smith said:
Surely, as professionals, is it not the responsibility of the trainee teachers themselves to ensure their own subject knowledge is secure before they teach the topic?
No Initial Teacher Training programme can possibly guarantee the subject knowledge of all its trainees in all three sciences up to GCSE level. The quantity of material is simply too much. Besides, it is only by getting into the classroom and being questioned by the students that you identify gaps in your own subject knowledge. It is not simply a matter of knowing the facts but understanding the way in which the students think, listening to their misconceptions and appreciating the reasons behind them. In my opinion, you only get this insight from standing up in front of the class and teaching.
Personally I believe school based teacher training is a great option but the support and funding for it must be passed on to the schools. It is not something that can be tagged on to the workload of already overworked teachers as a professional development exercise.
Leonard Winning needs some help identifying a teaching resource:
I can remember once seeing a resource that involved students taste-testing various penny sweets and ranking them on a scales for sweetness/sourness, hardness/softness, chewyness/brittleness or similar, plotted on a polygonal (hexagonal?) grid. I think it was intended as a general activity to illustrate measurements and data handling, so it might be from a chemistry source or a more general science one.
I had thought this would be a great cross-departmental activity, but I can't now find the resource! Does anyone recognise it?
Can you help locate this resource?
You can read all the contributions in full, and carry on the debate on the Talk Chemistry website.
Join in the discussions and share ideas and resources
External links will open in a new browser window
- Several tweeters contacted EiC with their views on last issue's Endpoint article by Vanessa Kind on teacher training. @hrogerson said:
Good article, points well made. Personally, I see nothing yet to suggest teaching schools will improve ITT.
@professor_dave also gave us his opinion:
Gove wants those with best degrees to teach. But surely we need chemists teaching chemistry first.
What do you think? Take a look at Vanessa's article and let us know.
- @declanfleming posted a message to the author of a story in last issue's Distillates research round-up:Hey @L_Howes I just read your logic-controlled patches article in @RSC_EiC ... really cool!:)
There's more cool science in this issue's Distillates.
- As you can imagine, we really like it when we receive feedback like this tweet from @michaelkls:
Got my copy of @RSC_EiC yesterday. Really impressed by breadth of content. The Moleis excellent too, great resource for chemistry teachers.
We retweeted his message - all the more special that this was our 1000th tweet!
- @TTCSSIXTHFORM had a message for their students based on an article we tweeted:
'Ruthenium compounds as anticancer agents bit.ly/EiC0112p26 ' this is why many of you (despite exams) #lovechemistry
Hopefully this article on some cutting-edge anticancer chemistry inspired their students, despite their exams!
- Finally, this tweet from @KL_Scheikunde caught our eye:
801 leerlingen bij grootste chemieles ooit bit.ly/EiC290212 (Engels)
Which we think is Dutch for '801 pupils in largest ever chemistry lesson' - a reference to our news story on the school in Hounslow who broke the world record for the largest ever chemistry lesson at the end of February. Read all about it on page 3.
Follow us on Twitter for the latest chemistry education news.
"...the time is ripe that we take a closer look at our technicians and their individual skills, qualities and attributes..."
New ruthenium-based compounds with fewer and less severe side effects, could replace longstanding platinum-based anticancer drugs
29 February 2012
A school in Hounslow has broken the record for the world's largest chemistry lesson
A look at recent chemical science research from Chemistry World
EiC on Twitter
Follow us on Twitter @RSC_EiC
EiC Facebook Page
Become a fan of Education in Chemistry on our Facebook page
EiC on Google+
Add us to your circles on Google+
EiC on LinkedIn
Join the Education in Chemistry group on LinkedIn
External links will open in a new browser window
Contact and Further Information
EiC Editorial Office
Royal Society of Chemistry, Thomas Graham House, Science Park, Milton Rd, Cambridge CB4 0WF
Tel: +44 (0)1223 420066