News from across RSC Publishing.
Instant insight: Understanding our food
04 September 2009
Monika Pischetsrieder and Rainer Baeuerlein from the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany, look at how the safety of GM food can be assured before it reaches supermarket shelves
Fifty-five genetically modified (GM) food or feed items are currently awaiting authorisation by the European Union. Evaluating the safety of GM organisms, which is carried out by the European Food Safety Authority, usually takes more than three years and includes a rigorous risk assessment. In order to simplify the process, the concept of substantial equivalence has been introduced. This means that a GM tomato, for example, is regarded as safe if it has the same composition as a traditionally produced tomato. But what does 'the same composition' mean? Usually, analysing substantial equivalence focuses on the main components, such as sugar and protein concentrations as well as critical nutrients and anti-nutritional factors, such as vitamins or solanine (a toxic tomato component). However, it has been argued that genome modification may lead to unexpected random effects with unknown consequences for the consumer. And these random effects may be overlooked if it is only the main components that are analysed. To combat this, untargeted analytical methods, which promise to give a systematic view of food composition, were introduced into the safety assessment of GM food. The most promising approaches for this purpose are omics-methods.

Proteomics researchers have the methods and techniques for understanding our food, the challengeis to find a way to handle and interpret the complex data generated |
In other areas of food science, researchers have also used proteome analysis to give an overview of protein composition in biological samples. To study a particular food's effect on the body-physiological or nutritional activity-the food item is traditionally administered to cultured cells or animals and the response of selected diagnostic markers is recorded. Alternatively, any changes to the whole proteome that can be seen as a reaction to the treatment reduce the chance to overlook any unexpected beneficial reactions or toxic side-reactions. As a result, the process of identifying bioactive food items or components, which affect metabolism and health, should be largely accelerated.
To understand complex interactions between food production, composition and their effects on the human body, it seems that proteomics researchers have the method and technique bases covered. Now, the challenge for scientists is to find a way to handle and interpret the complex data generated.
Read more in Monika Pischetsrieder and Rainer Baeuerlein's tutorial review 'Proteome research in food science' in issue 9, 2009 of Chemical Society Reviews.
Enjoy this story? Spread the word using the 'tools' menu on the left or add a comment to the Chemistry World blog.
Link to journal article
Proteome research in food science
Monika Pischetsrieder and Rainer Baeuerlein, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 2600
DOI: 10.1039/b817898b
Also of interest
Instant insight: Is your food safe to eat?
Gordon Shephard highlights the analytical methods used to ensure our food is free from the natural toxins produced by fungi
Ultrasonic spectroscopy could be used to evaluate the quality of so-called functional foods, say scientists in Canada.
Food
Copyright: 2008Tom Coultate
A fully revised and updated edition of the classic book on the chemistry of food - essential for students and teachers of food science and nutrition.
