CrystEngComm publishes novel findings from research in the field of crystal engineering. A primary requirement is that the paper reports work of high quality and originality that warrants rapid publication. The 2005 Impact Factor for CrystEngComm was 3.508 - please keep this in mind when giving your recommendation.

1. How would you rate this paper? *
   
   Very significant (top 10%)
   Significant (10-25%)
   Routine (25-50%)
   Poor/Unacceptable (bottom 50%)

   
   

2. Does this article deserve promotion as a Hot Article? *
   
   Yes
   No
   

   
   

3. Does this article fall within the scope of the journal? *
   
   Yes
   No
   

   
   

4. Is the technical quality of the work of a high standard? *
   
   Yes
   No
   

   
   

5. Are the results in this manuscript supported by the experimental/theoretical evidence supplied? *
   
   Yes
   No
   
   Please give details in your comments of any deficiencies.

   
   

6. Is the article's length commensurate with its content? (Please consider any relevant page limits when answering) *
   
   Yes
   No
   
   If the article is too long, please include in your comments recommendations for deleting text, tables or illustrations.

   
   

7. Are the references up-to-date and accessible, and have all key references been cited? *
   
   Yes
   No
   
   Please give details in your comments of any citations that have been omitted.

   
   

8. Could any material be transferred to the RSC's Electronic Supplementary Information area? *
   
   Yes
   No
   
   Please give details in your comments.

   
   

9. What is your recommendation? *
   
   Accept - unchanged
   Accept - with minor revisions
   Accept - with major revisions
   Reconsider - after major revisions
   Reject - fragmentation/lack of new material - see comments
   Reject - lack of novelty/significance - see comments
   Reject - scientific reasons - see comments
   Reject - other - see comments
   
   Your recommendation cannot be used unless justification is provided. Please support your recommendation in your comments.

   
   

If you recommend acceptance you must provide details to support this decision and you should outline any revisions (which should be achievable within 10 days) and indicate any additional experimental evidence required to support the results (e.g. as Electronic Supplementary Information).

If you recommend rejection you must provide details to support this decision. If you feel that work may be suitable for publication elsewhere please indicate the most appropriate journal and format.

Type/paste your comments here: *

OR Upload a document file - MS Word (.doc), plain text (.txt) or Acrobat (.pdf) files only:

OPTIONAL Comments for Editorial Office only: