Preliminary accounts of original and significant work of such importance or novelty that rapid publication is justified may be published as a CrystEngComm Communication. The 2007 Impact Factor for CrystEngComm was 3.468 - please keep this in mind when giving your recommendation.

1. How would you rate this paper? *
   
   Very significant (top 10%)
   Significant (10-25%)
   Routine (25-50%)
   Poor/Unacceptable (bottom 50%)

   
   

2. Is the technical quality of the work of an appropriate standard? *
   
   Yes
   No
   

   
   

3. If you have been asked by the Editorial Office to assess the crystallography in this article, has the crystallography been performed to a satisfactory level, and are the conclusions drawn by the author appropriate to the quality of the crystallographic study? *
   
   Yes
   No
   
   Please give details in your comments of any deficiencies.

   
   

4. What is your recommendation? *
   
   Accept - unchanged
   Accept - with minor revisions
   Accept - after major revisions
   Reconsider - after major revisions
   Reject
   
   Your recommendation cannot be used unless justification is provided. Please support your recommendation in your comments.

   
   

5. Is this article better suited for publication in another RSC journal? *
   
   Yes
   No
   
   Please give details in your comments.

   
   

If you recommend acceptance you must provide details to support this decision and you should outline any revisions (which should be achievable within 10 days) and indicate any additional experimental evidence required to support the results (e.g. as Electronic Supplementary Information).

If you recommend rejection you must provide details to support this decision. If you feel that work may be suitable for publication elsewhere please indicate the most appropriate journal and format.

Type/paste your comments here: *

OR Upload a document file - MS Word (.doc), plain text (.txt) or Acrobat (.pdf) files only:

OPTIONAL Comments for Editorial Office only: