RSC - Advancing the Chemical Sciences


 

Referee Report Form


Full Paper


Integrative Biology
Editorial Office, Cambridge, UK


Your ReSourCe identifier: *


Your email address: *

 (a copy will be sent to this address)

Paper reference number: *

 (e.g. B012345A)


Integrative Biology full papers:

  • must provide new knowledge or elucidate novel mechanisms of biological processes obtained through the innovative application of technology
  • should address the broad audience of Integrative Biology



    1. To what extent does this paper demonstrate: *

      INSIGHT into the biological mechanism/process/explored phenomena?

         1 = Low, 10 = High

      INNOVATION in the technology used to enable the biological insight?

         1 = Low, 10 = High

      INTEGRATION of the technology and biology?

         1 = Low, 10 = High

      Please give separate sections in your comments, marked "INSIGHT", "INNOVATION" and "INTEGRATION", which elaborate on your responses.


    2. In the application of technology have the authors considered prior literature/methods and possible artefacts? *

      Yes
      No

      Please give details in your comments of any omissions.


    3. Is there any evidence that the described process/phenomena/mechanism occurs or could occur in vivo? *

      Yes
      No

      Please give details in your comments.


    4. Are the objectives, salient features and important quantitative data stated in the abstract? *

      Yes
      No


    5. Could any material be transferred to the RSC's Electronic Supplementary Information area? *

      Yes
      No

      Please give details in your comments.


    6. Are the references up-to-date and accessible, and have all key references been cited? *

      Yes
      No

      Please give details in your comments of any citations that have been omitted.


    7. Does the article include adequate explanations of the underlying biological or physical principles or scaling laws accounting for the observed behaviour? *

      Yes
      No


    8. What contribution does this paper make to the subject area it addresses? *



      1 = Poor, 10 = Outstanding


    9. What is your recommendation? *

      Accept - unchanged
      Accept - with minor revisions
      Accept - with major revisions
      Reconsider - after major revisions
      Reject - fragmentation/lack of new material - see comments
      Reject - lack of novelty/significance - see comments
      Reject - scientific reasons - see comments
      Reject - other - see comments

      Your recommendation cannot be used unless justification is provided. Please support your recommendation in your comments.



    If you recommend acceptance you must provide details to support this decision and you should outline any revisions and indicate any additional experimental evidence required to support the results (e.g. as Electronic Supplementary Information).

    If you recommend rejection you must provide details to support this decision. If you feel that work may be suitable for publication elsewhere please indicate the most appropriate journal and format.


    Type/paste your comments here: *

    OR Upload a document file - MS Word (.doc), plain text (.txt) or Acrobat (.pdf) files only:



    OPTIONAL Comments for Editorial Office only:


    * These are required fields

     

  • General
    We advise referees to store a copy of the report, for example as a word processor document, for a short period of time in case there are any difficulties transmitting the report over the web.

    Data Protection
    Please note that you and the RSC are jointly responsible for ensuring compliance with the UK Data Protection Act (1998) in the preparation, transmission, and storage of this report. In particular, you should ensure that your report is prepared and stored securely, and that it is not held for an excessive length of time. If you have any queries, please contact the Journals Administration Officer.