Lego-like DNA bricks are child's play

Any array of 32 nucleotide DNA Lego blocks can be built into a whole range of different shapes © Yonggang Ke

DNA building blocks have been pieced together to form a multitude of Lego-like bricks by researchers at Harvard University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the US. The bricks are nanoscopic but can be locked together like children's Lego blocks and have been used to create more than one hundred distinct shapes with complex surfaces, as well interiors with pores and tunnels.

Chemists have always had the option of turning to natural molecular recognition and self-assembly to help them build novel structures and devices. A wide range of structures is possible using so-called DNA origami for instance. However, while this approach has not been limited to flat, two-dimensional DNA tiles and highly complex structures are possible, the process is not modular. DNA building blocks offer the possibility of constructing much more sophisticated structures and molecular devices.

Peng Yin and colleagues describe their approach to making structures from DNA bricks as both simple and robust. They start with 32 nucleotide strands comprising two head domains and two tail domains each of which is 8 bases in length. They liken the tail-end of each brick to the protruding knobble on a child's Lego brick that is pushed into the hole of another brick. With an almost limitless range 32 nucleotide bricks available they can construct myriad three-dimensional structures by sticking the bricks together. Protector bricks close off holes and knobbles and prevent additional bricks from attaching themselves to the 3D structure once it is complete.

By treating each 8-base pair as a ‘voxel’ – the volume equivalent of a pixel – in a 10x10x10 three-dimensional array, the team can use a computer to construct a specific shape in silico. The computer then tells them which specific strands present in which bricks from their construction set are needed to build that shape. These are then mixed together, self-assemble and are annealed into the structure in a single step. Using this approach the team has made 100 three-dimensional shapes representing the characters of the English alphabet and the number 0 to 9, as well as arbitrary shapes such as faces and blocks with specific patterns of channels and holes. The team suggests that the approach could be extended to bigger or more sophisticated bricks given adequate computing power for the design process.

DNA origami expert Hendrik Dietz of the Technical University of Munich, Germany, says: 'The 3D thing is so awesome, I almost got tears in my eyes because of the joy. I love the Lego figures. When looking at this, one cannot help but submit to the power of DNA. Incredibly stunning results.' However, he adds that it remains to be seen whether these DNA blocks are practical enough to produce high quality shapes useful to nanotechnologists.

Related Content

Cutting edge chemistry in 2013

12 December 2013 Research

news image

We take a look back at the year's most interesting chemical science stories

Chemistry World podcast - January 2013

7 January 2013 Podcast | Monthly

news image

David MacMillan talks building design, John Rogers discusses nanofabrication and the team cover the latest news

Most Read

Coated nanoparticles show Alzheimer's promise

12 September 2014 News and Analysis

news image

Gold nanoparticles functionalised with amino acid polymer inhibit the growth of amyloid fibres associated with neurodegenerat...

First flexible graphene display paves the way for folding electronics

11 September 2014 News and Analysis

news image

Team behind the bendy e-reader display hope to have a full colour graphene-based smartphone style screen within a year

Most Commented

Computer simulations point to formamide as prebiotic intermediate in ‘Miller’ mixtures

16 September 2014 News and Analysis

news image

Electric field may have provided more than just energy for primordial chemistry

The trouble with boycotts

29 August 2014 Critical Point

news image

Cutting academic ties with a censured state can do more harm than good, says Mark Peplow