Low acrylamide potato on the horizon


potatoes

During cooking, different varieties of potatoes can produce widely varying levels of the carcinogen acrylamide © Shutterstock

In response to European concerns over high levels of the carcinogen acrylamide in processed foods, researchers are looking to reduce dietary levels of the chemical by developing a new variety of potato. But research looking at why different varieties of potato produce widely varying levels of acrylamide during frying shows that it is going to be an uphill struggle.

Acrylamide is formed during high temperature cooking via the Maillard reaction. This reaction also produces the molecules which give fried and baked food its attractive colour and flavour. The chemical has been linked to an elevated risk of cancer in humans, so regulators are keen to limit the amount present in wheat, rye and potato products.

One approach is to develop potato varieties that are low in acrylamide precursors – the amino acid asparagine and reducing sugars. This is the goal of a large BBSRC-funded project; however, in potatoes, the link between the precursors and acrylamide levels are far from simple.

As part of efforts to discover which characteristics a low acrylamide-forming potato needs, researchers investigated the formation of the chemical in nine different potato varieties. Four of them are used to make crisps and five that are used for chips or French fries. The team, led by Nigel Halford from Rothamsted Research, UK, measured the levels of acrylamide precursors in each variety, along with the amount of acrylamide formed during frying. The precursor-acrylamide relationship was found to be variety dependent.

‘We find if we separate the crisp varieties from the French fry varieties we see an effect of sugars in both,’ explains Halford, ‘but we only see a strong effect of asparagine in the French fry varieties. We also found a massive range of acrylamide-forming potential among individual varieties – in crisps, for example, the lowest was forming 104ppb and the highest over 5000ppb.’

The study identified two crisp potato varieties – Lady Clare and Saturna where acrylamide formation was consistently below the European commission's ideal of 1000ppb. Unfortunately, the complexity of the precursor–acrylamide relationship makes it very difficult to identify specific targets for breeding programmes.

‘We are also looking at the effects of different growing conditions and trying to understand the genetics and biochemistry of precursor metabolism,’ says Halford. ‘Our aim is to come up with the tools to produce low acrylamide varieties for 10–15 years in the future when there may be [harsher] regulatory limits.’

Lydia Smith from the National Institute of Agricultural Botany (NIAB) welcomed the research but warns the results of a one-year study should be treated with caution. ‘Potatoes are really sensitive to changes in conditions,’ she says, ‘and past studies have shown variation [in precursor concentration] across years can be almost as much as variation between varieties.’


Related Content

Chemistry World podcast - January 2013

7 January 2013 Podcast | Monthly

news image

David MacMillan talks building design, John Rogers discusses nanofabrication and the team cover the latest news

Soaking spuds cuts cancer-risk chemical in chips

6 March 2008 News Archive

news image

Washing or enzyme treatment reduces acrylamide formation during potato frying

Most Read

Higher levels of some metals in e-cigarette smoke

8 September 2014 Research

news image

Scientists call for regulators to help clear smoke and mirrors surrounding vaping safety

Isotope effect produces new type of chemical bond

22 October 2014 Research

news image

Evidence emerges for vibrational bond first proposed 30 years ago

Most Commented

Higher levels of some metals in e-cigarette smoke

8 September 2014 Research

news image

Scientists call for regulators to help clear smoke and mirrors surrounding vaping safety

Not all science is created equal

16 October 2014 Comments

news image

John Ioannidis explains why researchers should be curious about the differences between disciplines