Laropiprant recalled


Merck & Co has said it is recalling Tredaptive cholesterol tablets in response to trial results that raised safety concerns and the recommendations of a European Medicines Agency safety panel.

Tredaptive tablets are approved in the EU and elsewhere – but not in the US – for treating patients with high cholesterol levels. They contain niacin (vitamin B3), which increases levels of ‘good’ HDL cholesterol, and laropiprant, a patent protected compound designed to reduce facial flushing, a common side effect of taking niacin.

The data suggest that the tablets are not as effective as hoped at reducing heart attacks, deaths and strokes in patients with high levels of ‘bad’, LDL cholesterol. They also suggest that the side effects are worse than expected.

Merck & Co said that doctors should stop prescribing the drug and review treatment plans for patients already taking it.

US regulators rejected laropiprant for market approval in 2008.


Related Content

HDL drug class struggling after latest flop

27 May 2012 Business

news image

The failure of another 'good' cholesterol-raising drug and a new genetic study casts shadow over HDL hypothesis

Regulator rebuffs Merck's cholesterol drug

28 May 2008 News Archive

news image

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has unexpectedly refused to approve Merck's cholesterol-lowering drug Cordaptive

Most Read

Cannabis chemists look for professional recognition

16 October 2014 News and Analysis

news image

The American Chemical Society is being petitioned to form a division to help develop standards in the field

Not all science is created equal

16 October 2014 Comments

news image

John Ioannidis explains why researchers should be curious about the differences between disciplines

Most Commented

UCLA spent $4.5 million on legal costs in Sangji case

20 October 2014 News and Analysis

news image

University defends spending in case brought against chemistry professor, highlighting $20 million investment in lab safety

Not all science is created equal

16 October 2014 Comments

news image

John Ioannidis explains why researchers should be curious about the differences between disciplines