Dow makes $1.5bn divestiture plans


US chemical giant Dow has announced plans to sell more parts of its ‘non-core’ business, adding that it will target ‘an increased divestiture list of nearly $1.5 billion (£1 billion) over the next 18 months’.

The company had identified two parts in particular: the ‘polypropylene licensing and catalysts’ business unit and the plastics additives unit.

‘We are reviewing our entire portfolio and seeking even further opportunities to optimise value: selectively pruning assets that are no longer a strategic or financial fit,’ said Dow chair and chief executive Andrew Liveris.

In October 2012, Dow announced plans to cut 2400 jobs, representing 5% of its global workforce, and close 20 manufacturing plants, in a bid to shave $500 million off its annual costs over the next two years. Since then, it has struck deals to sell the stabilisers component of its plastics additives business and its 50% stake ownership in Nippon Unicar Company – a Japanese joint venture with Tonen Chemical.


Related Content

Copper catalysis sees the light

28 March 2013 Research

news image

Copper nanoparticle's oxidation state can be tuned using visible light, enabling industrially important propylene epoxidation

Going for silver: green plastic production

9 April 2010 News Archive

news image

A new class of silver based catalysts for propylene oxide formation based on subnanometer clusters of three silver atoms

Most Read

σ meets π for a hole lot of bonding

10 December 2014 Research

news image

Co-operating holes provide unique interaction opportunities

Cutting edge chemistry in 2014

10 December 2014 Research

news image

We take a look back at the year's most interesting chemical science stories

Most Commented

Smart skin for prosthetic limbs senses heat and touch

12 December 2014 Research

news image

Ultra-thin plastic skin can bend and flex without affecting the skin's ability to detect stimuli

Chemistry behind the ‘blue man’ unlocked

1 November 2012 Research

news image

Biochemical model suggests that silver ions, not nanoparticles, cause a rare skin complaint