Dow makes $1.5bn divestiture plans


US chemical giant Dow has announced plans to sell more parts of its ‘non-core’ business, adding that it will target ‘an increased divestiture list of nearly $1.5 billion (£1 billion) over the next 18 months’.

The company had identified two parts in particular: the ‘polypropylene licensing and catalysts’ business unit and the plastics additives unit.

‘We are reviewing our entire portfolio and seeking even further opportunities to optimise value: selectively pruning assets that are no longer a strategic or financial fit,’ said Dow chair and chief executive Andrew Liveris.

In October 2012, Dow announced plans to cut 2400 jobs, representing 5% of its global workforce, and close 20 manufacturing plants, in a bid to shave $500 million off its annual costs over the next two years. Since then, it has struck deals to sell the stabilisers component of its plastics additives business and its 50% stake ownership in Nippon Unicar Company – a Japanese joint venture with Tonen Chemical.


Related Content

Copper catalysis sees the light

28 March 2013 Research

news image

Copper nanoparticle's oxidation state can be tuned using visible light, enabling industrially important propylene epoxidation

Engines of innovation

29 September 2011 Feature

news image

Our desire for economical but environmentally friendly transport has driven progress in fuel and oil additives. But as Andy E...

Most Read

Higher levels of some metals in e-cigarette smoke

8 September 2014 Research

news image

Scientists call for regulators to help clear smoke and mirrors surrounding vaping safety

Isotope effect produces new type of chemical bond

22 October 2014 Research

news image

Evidence emerges for vibrational bond first proposed 30 years ago

Most Commented

Higher levels of some metals in e-cigarette smoke

8 September 2014 Research

news image

Scientists call for regulators to help clear smoke and mirrors surrounding vaping safety

Not all science is created equal

16 October 2014 Comments

news image

John Ioannidis explains why researchers should be curious about the differences between disciplines