Judge reverses jury decision over $6.5m Takeda payout


A judge has thrown out the jury’s verdict in a case between Japanese drugmaker Takeda and a US man who claims that the company’s drug caused his bladder cancer.

On 29 April, a jury decided in favour of Jack Cooper, saying that the company didn’t do enough to warn him that Actos (pioglitazone) would increase his risk of bladder cancer. The company was ordered to pay Cooper $6.5 million (£4.2 million) in damages.

However, Takeda appealed to the judge, claiming that there was not enough evidence to directly link Cooper’s cancer to the drug. The judge agreed and nullified the jury’s decision.

The case is the first of over 3300 that have been compiled against the company over bladder cancer claims. In 2011, after reviewing safety data on pioglitazone, the US Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) highlighted a possible but unproven link between the drug and increased risk of bladder cancer. The FDA recommended it not be prescribed to patients with active bladder cancer or history of the disease.

Takeda maintains that it has acted responsibly regarding the safety of Actos, disclosing safety data to regulatory authorities and warning about other side effects, such as heart problems.


Related Content

Missing safety risk emails draw $9bn Actos fine

11 April 2014 Business

news image

Judge finds absence of Takeda documentation in bladder cancer case ‘disturbing’

Pfizer and Takeda win $2.15bn in patent payout

14 June 2013 Business

news image

Teva and Sun fined for selling generics before patent expiry

Most Read

Isotope effect produces new type of chemical bond

22 October 2014 Research

news image

Evidence emerges for vibrational bond first proposed 30 years ago

Not all science is created equal

16 October 2014 Comments

news image

John Ioannidis explains why researchers should be curious about the differences between disciplines

Most Commented

UCLA spent $4.5 million on legal costs in Sangji case

20 October 2014 News and Analysis

news image

University defends spending in case brought against chemistry professor, highlighting $20 million investment in lab safety

Not all science is created equal

16 October 2014 Comments

news image

John Ioannidis explains why researchers should be curious about the differences between disciplines