AstraZeneca ends R&D in India


Pharmaceutical firm AstraZeneca (AZ) is quitting its R&D site in Bangalore, India. The closure means 168 employees, researching neglected tropical diseases, tuberculosis (TB) and malaria, will lose their jobs as AZ drops its early-stage research into these areas.

The company will retain more advanced projects, such as AZD5847, which is in Phase II trials against TB. It will also outsource the site’s current product development functions, or transfer them to Macclesfield, UK. However, AZ confirmed it will maintain access to its compound library for open innovation projects in neglected diseases.

The closure is part of AZs ongoing restructuring programme, which began last year, will cost a total of 1600 jobs worldwide and see the company’s main UK R&D activities move from Alderley Park to Cambridge. After the closure, AZ will have just over 1000 staff in India, across manufacturing, sales and marketing roles.


Related Content

Global AstraZeneca restructuring will cost 1600 jobs

19 March 2013 Business

news image

Firm will focus drug development efforts in three strategic R&D centres in the UK, Sweden and the US

Generation next

29 January 2014 Educated Chemist

news image

AstraZeneca is investing in the future of drug discovery with its new graduate training scheme in pharma. Manisha Lalloo find...

Most Read

Quintuple bond activates small stable molecules

19 September 2014 Research

news image

Exotic complexes suggest route to synthetic feedstock

Computer simulations point to formamide as prebiotic intermediate in ‘Miller’ mixtures

16 September 2014 News and Analysis

news image

Electric field may have provided more than just energy for primordial chemistry

Most Commented

US genomics lead being lost to China

17 September 2014 News and Analysis

news image

NIH senior leaders are sounding the alarm bells, saying the US's pre-eminence in genomics research is under threat

The trouble with boycotts

29 August 2014 Critical Point

news image

Cutting academic ties with a censured state can do more harm than good, says Mark Peplow