Disorder opens up battery material field


Conventional wisdom holds that ordered, layered materials allow lithium ions in and out better than disordered materials © Xin Li, Dong Su, Alexander Urban and Jinhyuk Lee

Better lithium-ion batteries that hold more power could be made by introducing disorder into their electrodes – going against the prevailing wisdom on the best way to improve them. The discovery that an ordered, crystalline structure is not necessary to create good battery electrodes should vastly increase the number of candidate materials available to battery scientists.

Lithium-ion batteries can hold more energy per unit mass than traditional rechargeable batteries such as nickel–cadmium, allowing portable electronics to be made smaller and lighter and last longer between recharges. But for high-power applications, manufacturers still need higher charge capacities to, for example, give electric cars greater range.  

When a lithium-ion battery is discharged lithium ions flow into the cathode and are then driven back to the anode during recharging. Maximising the charge capacity of the battery therefore involves increasing the electrodes ability to store and release lithium. Cathodes are traditionally made of a layered oxide in which lithium ions and transition metal ions sit in separate, well-defined planes. This ordering was thought necessary for efficient operation of the electrode because imperfections cause the oxide structure to contract, making it harder for lithium ions to squeeze in and out.

Gerbrand Ceder and colleagues at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Brookhaven National Laboratory studied Li1.211Mo0.467Cr0.3O2 to see if it would make a good cathode. This material has a layered rock salt-like structure, but just a few charge–discharge cycles cause some of the lithium cations to swap places randomly with transition metal ions, leaving the metal ‘cation disordered’. In principle, this should prevent lithium ions from entering or leaving and stop the cathode working. In fact, the material’s capacity remains steady despite the degradation of the structure.

Ceder and colleagues used electronic structure modelling to investigate. They found that cation randomisation does inhibit the diffusion of lithium ions in and out of the material, as conventional wisdom predicts. However, if enough lithium is present, seams of lithium ions form between the centre and the outside of the material, allowing lithium to diffuse in and out without passing a transition metal ion. ‘I think that's the most important thing,’ says Ceder, ‘It's not so much the new material but a new direction for looking for cathode materials.’

Materials scientist and engineer Yi Cui at Stanford University, US, is intrigued. ‘This is a very nice piece of work exploring a counter-intuitive materials design principle for high-capacity cathode materials,’ he says. ‘The cathode is the most limiting factor for the energy density of lithium-ion batteries, so the work here is timely in providing a potential new direction to look into.’


Related Content

Building batteries that breathe

24 July 2013 Jobs Profile (Personal)

news image

Long before energy storage materials were in vogue, Peter Bruce saw their potential, as Emma Davies finds out

Up in the air

23 November 2012 Premium contentFeature

news image

Philip Ball looks at the recent progress in lithium–air battery research - has it stalled?

Most Read

Not all science is created equal

16 October 2014 Comments

news image

John Ioannidis explains why researchers should be curious about the differences between disciplines

MDMA

9 October 2014 Podcast | Compounds

news image

The drug that fuelled rave culture may yet be a treatment for PTSD. Hayley Simon introduces MDMA

Most Commented

Helium happily shares electrons to create dianions

16 October 2014 Research

news image

Fullerene dianions created in nanodroplets of helium opening up new ways of creating exotic molecular species

Not all science is created equal

16 October 2014 Comments

news image

John Ioannidis explains why researchers should be curious about the differences between disciplines