Guidelines for laboratory design


Lois DiBerardinis, Janet Baum, Melvyn First, Geri Gatwood and Anand Seth 
Wiley
2013 | 552pp | £100
ISBN 9780470505526
Reviewed by Mike Dockery
http://rsc.li/CW_011404
 
This volume has the ambitious objective of providing design guidance for a wide range of types and sizes of laboratory. Unfortunately, and in the particular context of the UK, it has failings at both strategic and tactical levels, although there is still much that is of interest and use in its pages. 
The book references almost uniquely US practice (organisations, legislation, standards, codes, guidance) and describes lab formats that are scarcely ‘cutting edge’. And recent trends in fit-out schemes and systems are not fully covered. 
 
Some examples of deficiencies are the continuation of the small module building block approach so favoured by architects in assembling lab layouts and by structural engineers in defining an ‘optimum’ (traditional, small) grid that populates floorplates with a forest of columns at the cost of functionality, flexibility and adaptability. Also, mechanical and electrical engineering distribution schemes are only shown in relation to overall ‘layered’ building concepts (the so-called lasagne lab) and no mention is made of the ‘sidestitial’ alternative that has recently been so successful for automation of research facilities. 
 
Sustainability in lab design should be an integrated and front-end goal yet it receives, together with the pioneering Labs21 group, little attention until chapters 35 and 38. No reference is made to the non-US equivalents.
 
Despite these criticisms, there is much that represents sound advice and pragmatic guidance. The importance of a design team with representation from all interested stakeholder groups is stressed and the often controversial subjects of when to use, or more frequently not to use, recirculation filtration fume cupboards and auto sash closing are given appropriate consideration. Another old chestnut that is effectively challenged is the common misinterpretation that higher fume cupboard face velocities provide enhanced containment. There are also helpful and reasonably universal chapters dealing with waste management and stores strategies.
 
This does not constitute a completely satisfactory manual for the design of a chemistry laboratory in the UK. It may, however, be regarded as useful background reading that illustrates the breadth and complexity of the issues involved. Thus, it has some worth for those undertaking lab design without having the appropriate experience, an unfortunate but all too common situation in the UK.
 
Purchase Guidelines for laboratory design from Amazon.co.uk
 

Related Content

Safety first?

29 May 2014 Feature

news image

Just how safe is working in a laboratory? Jon Evans discovers that it depends on where you are

Digging deep for safer water

27 March 2014 Premium contentFeature

news image

Arsenic-laced water is still poisoning millions of people in Asia. Nina Notman looks to see if an end is in sight

Most Read

Higher levels of some metals in e-cigarette smoke

8 September 2014 Research

news image

Scientists call for regulators to help clear smoke and mirrors surrounding vaping safety

Isotope effect produces new type of chemical bond

22 October 2014 Research

news image

Evidence emerges for vibrational bond first proposed 30 years ago

Most Commented

Higher levels of some metals in e-cigarette smoke

8 September 2014 Research

news image

Scientists call for regulators to help clear smoke and mirrors surrounding vaping safety

Not all science is created equal

16 October 2014 Comments

news image

John Ioannidis explains why researchers should be curious about the differences between disciplines