Sanofi suffers multiple sclerosis setback


French pharmaceutical Sanofi has run into trouble after the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rejected its multiple sclerosis drug Lemtrada (alemtuzumab). The agency said that its rejection of alemtuzumab was the result of poor Phase III clinical trial design and side effects that outweigh the potential benefits.

When Sanofi bought Genzyme for more than $20 billion (£12 billion) in February 2011, additional milestone payments were agreed, depending on the success of alemtuzumab. The monoclonal antibody was approved to treat multiple sclerosis in the EU in September 2013, leading to expectations that the FDA would follow suit in the US.

Without the US market, Lemtrada is very unlikely to meet sales targets, and consequently Sanofi’s share price fell by 1.1%. Furthermore, one US law firm is launching a class action on behalf of investors, claiming the French company made misleading statements about the prospects for alemtuzumab.

In a press release, a spokesperson for Genzyme stated that they strongly disagree with the conclusions and plan to appeal against the FDA’s decision.


Related Content

2012 pharma industry roundup

3 January 2013 Business

news image

What were the bigger stories? And how did the industry fare overall?

Sanofi to buy Genzyme in $20 billion deal

17 February 2011 News Archive

news image

Sanofi-Aventis wins over Genzyme board with $1.5 billion increase to August 2010 bid

Most Read

Higher levels of some metals in e-cigarette smoke

8 September 2014 Research

news image

Scientists call for regulators to help clear smoke and mirrors surrounding vaping safety

Isotope effect produces new type of chemical bond

22 October 2014 Research

news image

Evidence emerges for vibrational bond first proposed 30 years ago

Most Commented

Higher levels of some metals in e-cigarette smoke

8 September 2014 Research

news image

Scientists call for regulators to help clear smoke and mirrors surrounding vaping safety

Not all science is created equal

16 October 2014 Comments

news image

John Ioannidis explains why researchers should be curious about the differences between disciplines