$1.2bn J&J deceptive marketing fine overturned


The Arkansas Supreme Court has overturned a lower court’s fine of $1.2 billion (£725 million), imposed on Johnson & Johnson’s subsidiary Janssen in April 2012 over its marketing of antipsychotic drug Risperdal (risperidone).

The state of Arkansas’s case against Janssen revolves around its handling of a request by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to inform doctors of possible side effects of the whole class of atypical antipsychotics, to which risperidone belongs. Briefly, the case contends that Janssen misled doctors about the safety of risperidone relative to other drugs, causing them to prescribe it favourably. Since many of these prescriptions were paid for by the US Medicaid scheme for helping poor patients afford drugs, Arkansas claims the company defrauded the state.

In part, the fine was overturned because the Supreme Court decided that law that the State was accusing Janssen of contravening applies to healthcare institutions, not pharmaceutical companies. Janssen is awaiting a ruling in South Carolina over similar allegations, and a similar case in Louisiana was overturned in January. None of these cases are related to the J&J’s $2.2 billion fine from a federal case brought by the US Department of Justice over mismarketing of Risperdal.


Related Content

Riding new waves

6 January 2015 Business

news image

Pharmaceutical industry roundup of 2014

Weathering the storm

6 January 2014 Business

news image

Pharmaceutical industry roundup 2013

Most Read

Schott's glass

29 April 2015 Classic Kit

news image

Life through a lens

First pictures of hydrogen bonds unveiled

26 September 2013 Research

news image

Observation of intermolecular interactions in quinolines could help to settle the nature of this kind of bonding

Most Commented

Science for life: a manual for better living

1 May 2015 Review

news image

Looking beyond the hype

An unfortunate oversight

27 April 2015 Critical Point

news image

The US Toxic Substances Control Act is in dire need of reform. That demands compromises, says Mark Peplow