Up from generality


Jay A Labinger
Springer
2013 | 75pp | £44.99
ISBN 9783642401190
Reviewed by Bill Griffith
http://rsc.li/CW_140405
 
A case can be made for inorganic chemistry being the oldest branch of our subject, developing from studies on metals and metallic ‘salts’ from ancient times and progressing to the theories and observations of Antoine Lavoisier, John Dalton, Humphrey Davy and others in the 18th and early 19th centuries. 
 
This book is really an extended essay on inorganic chemistry, concentrating on the period from the mid-20th century to the present and in particular the upsurge – the so-called ‘renaissance’ – proclaimed in the 1950s. Labinger’s account of this and of later developments in the subject is perceptive and interesting. 
 
In the first two chapters, covering the subject in the 19th century and into the first half of the 20th century, the author’s views on early inorganic chemistry seem unduly minimalist. There is no mention of the great pioneers listed above, though Edward Frankland, Dmitri Mendeleev and Alfred Werner do appear. 
 
In Labinger’s view, inorganic was simply part of general chemistry, hence his rather unwieldy title. Although he correctly states that ‘inorganic chemistry’ was not coined in English until 1831, this is equally true of ‘organic chemistry’, first used in 1828. The number of books on inorganic and organic chemistry published from 1835–1875 and kept by the British Library are almost the same (17 for inorganic, 15 for organic – many of the latter are translations), but only three on general chemistry. Thus, inorganic chemistry was recognised as a distinct discipline and was in rude health in those crucial years.
 
For Labinger and, he suggests, for many of his countrymen, the subject really starts after Ronald Nyholm’s ‘prescient but premature’ announcement in 1956 of the renaissance of inorganic chemistry, born of advances in structure, bonding, mechanistics and organometallic studies. 
 
The book is US-centric, and describes inorganic chemistry at Labinger’s workplace, the California Institute of Technology, in the mid-1950s. Here, the eccentric but now largely forgotten Don Yost kept a vast chemical archive (including, incongruously, used train tickets), together with material directed against his bête noir and uncomfortable colleague, Linus Pauling.
 
Labinger feels that inorganic chemistry is now a coherent discipline, unlikely to fragment, and with an assured future. His book is well written, well-referenced and gently provocative. However, as a soft-bound book of only 77 pages, with poorly-reproduced monochrome images, it is outrageously expensive.
 
Purchase Up from generality from Amazon.co.uk
 

Related Content

China's foreigner investment

26 February 2014 The Insider

news image

As China positions itself as a world-leader in research, western scientists are in demand. Vikki Cantrill talks to the chemis...

Chemistry World podcast - May 2013

2 May 2013 Podcast | Monthly

news image

Robert Lovitt tells us about algae biotechnology, Patrick Holland discusses nitrogen fixing chemistry and the team cover the ...

Most Read

Bubble wrap could send lab costs packing

23 July 2014 Research

news image

Potential bubbles up across wide range of uses as storage and test vessels, especially for poor countries

Coffee cup confusion

20 July 2014 Research

news image

Scientists call for better labelling after research highlights inconsistencies in the chemical composition of a cup of coffee

Most Commented

Bubble wrap could send lab costs packing

23 July 2014 Research

news image

Potential bubbles up across wide range of uses as storage and test vessels, especially for poor countries

Relativity behind mercury's liquidity

21 June 2013 Research

news image

First evidence that relativistic effects are indeed responsible for mercury's low melting point