Chinese police hand GSK bribery case to prosecutors


Chinese police have concluded their investigation into allegations of bribery and corruption at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) China. A spokesperson from the company’s UK office confirmed that the Chinese Ministry of Public Security (MPS) has passed the case to the Changsha People’s Procurator in Hunan province for review.

The Chinese state news agency Xinhua has released details of the police investigation, claiming that 46 suspects are involved including Mark Reilly, former manager of GSK China. The investigation alleges that Reilly ordered staff to bribe hospitals, doctors and other medical institutions and organisations to enable them to meet ambitious sales targets. It also implicates GSK China staff in deliberately inflating prices relative to other countries, and disguising illegal revenue.

In a statement, GSK said that it was taking the allegations very seriously and would continue to cooperate with the authorities. ‘We want to reach a resolution that will enable the company to continue to make an important contribution to the health and welfare of China and its citizens.’


Related Content

GSK’s China troubles continue

6 August 2014 Business

news image

Analysts say stings will only drive corruption into less visible channels

China corruption investigation broadens

29 July 2013 Business

news image

GSK scandal is the trigger to clean up Chinese drug market

Most Read

Isotope effect produces new type of chemical bond

22 October 2014 Research

news image

Evidence emerges for vibrational bond first proposed 30 years ago

Not all science is created equal

16 October 2014 Comments

news image

John Ioannidis explains why researchers should be curious about the differences between disciplines

Most Commented

UCLA spent $4.5 million on legal costs in Sangji case

20 October 2014 News and Analysis

news image

University defends spending in case brought against chemistry professor, highlighting $20 million investment in lab safety

Not all science is created equal

16 October 2014 Comments

news image

John Ioannidis explains why researchers should be curious about the differences between disciplines