Time called on Pfizer–AstraZeneca deal


Pfizer’s pursuit of a pharmaceutical megamerger with AstraZeneca (AZ) has concluded with the US giant withdrawing its final offer two hours before the deadline set by the UK’s takeover rules.

The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers allows Pfizer to make a new approach to AZ after a six month cooling off period, or AZ can invite Pfizer to negotiate after three months. Given the Anglo-Swedish firm’s steadfast refusal to entertain Pfizer’s advances, the latter option seems unlikely. ‘We welcome the opportunity to continue building on the momentum we have already demonstrated as an independent company,’ AZ’s chairman Leif Johansson said in a statement after the withdrawal.

Pfizer, in its turn, is leaving the door open. ‘We continue to believe that our final proposal was compelling and represented full value for AstraZeneca based on the information that was available to us’ said chief executive Ian Read in the withdrawal statement. The value and attactiveness of any new offer will depend strongly on how well AZ lives up to predictions about forthcoming drugs made by the board to justify its refusal of this deal. 


Related Content

Pfizer presses hard for AstraZeneca deal

14 May 2014 Business

news image

Executives face down international controversy over tax schemes and previous post-merger record

Pfizer courts AstraZeneca megamerger

29 April 2014 Business

news image

AZ rebuffs public dealmongering

Most Read

Higher levels of some metals in e-cigarette smoke

8 September 2014 Research

news image

Scientists call for regulators to help clear smoke and mirrors surrounding vaping safety

Isotope effect produces new type of chemical bond

22 October 2014 Research

news image

Evidence emerges for vibrational bond first proposed 30 years ago

Most Commented

Higher levels of some metals in e-cigarette smoke

8 September 2014 Research

news image

Scientists call for regulators to help clear smoke and mirrors surrounding vaping safety

UCLA spent $4.5 million on legal costs in Sangji case

20 October 2014 News and Analysis

news image

University defends spending in case brought against chemistry professor, highlighting $20 million investment in lab safety