US agencies report back on safeguarding chemical plants


west_fertilizer

The explosion at the West Fertilizer plant killed 15 people © Demotix/Press Association Images

A long-awaited plan to bolster the safety of US chemical plants is facing some industry opposition. The report issued by an interagency government task force was released on 6 June in response to last year’s deadly explosion at the West Fertilizer plant in Texas that was caused by improper storage of ammonium nitrate.

The report was in response to an executive order that President Obama issued in in August 2013. That directive told agencies to review their industrial chemical safety regulations and improve coordination.

The task force said ammonium nitrate poses a unique challenge because it is a high-volume chemical used in both the fertiliser and explosives industries, and it identified opportunities to improve safeguards. For example, its report noted that the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) risk management programme doesn’t cover ammonium nitrate. However, it said the agency is considering whether to add ammonium nitrate and other reactive substances to its existing list of regulated substances.

By October, the EPA is expected to have determined whether additional changes are necessary to complement a separate standard of the Labor Department’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). That OSHA process safety management standard covers some reactive chemicals, but not ammonium nitrate.

Currently, OSHA is considering whether ammonium nitrate hazards are best controlled under its blasting agents standard or process safety standard, or a combination of both. The agency will pursue ‘any appropriate regulatory changes as expeditiously as possible’, the task force said. In addition, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will soon finalise rules that require ammonium nitrate purchasers and sellers to register and be vetted against a central terrorist watch list.

‘There is a real important need to integrate and coordinate among the federal agencies that have responsibility for chemical plant safety,’ says Mathy Stanislaus, assistant administrator of the EPA's Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. This includes greater cooperation in areas like data sharing, modernising policies and regulations, and identifying noncompliant facilities, he states.

But the federal plan is encountering resistance from industry. The National Association of Chemical Distributors (NACD) and the American Chemistry Council (ACC) are concerned that it would increase the scope and complexity of regulations, and try to integrate ‘inherently safer technologies’ (IST) into current processes. The ACC warns that focusing on these ‘safer alternatives’ could create an ‘unnecessary layer of duplicative requirements’ that would confuse chemical plants and stretch agency resources. 


Related Content

All hail shale

7 January 2014 Business

news image

Chemical industry roundup 2013

US plans 30% emissions cuts for power plants

5 June 2014 News and Analysis

news image

The Obama administration’s proposed Clean Power Plan has been well-received by environmental groups, but attacked by indust...

Most Read

Antimicrobial resistance will kill 300 million by 2050 without action

16 December 2014 News and Analysis

news image

UK report says resistance will cost global economy $100 trillion

Cutting edge chemistry in 2014

10 December 2014 Research

news image

We take a look back at the year's most interesting chemical science stories

Most Commented

A bad business

19 December 2014 Critical Point

news image

Targets and assessments can boost productivity at universities – but only if they do not stifle creativity and alienate the...

Unusual 2D silica allotrope predicted

25 June 2014 Research

news image

Simulations say graphene-like silica would become thicker when stretched