DuPont settles pollution charges for $1.3m


Chemical titan DuPont has agreed a settlement with US authorities over eight hazardous chemical leaks from the company’s plant in Belle, US, between 2006 and 2010. DuPont will pay $1.3 million (£770,000) in fines, and make various improvements to its safety and emergency response procedures, which the firm estimates will cost a further $1.3 million to implement.

The allegations from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Department of Justice contend that DuPont ‘released harmful quantities of hazardous substances and then did not report the releases to the National Response Center, State Emergency Response Commission and Local Emergency Planning Committee in a timely manner’. The most serious of these releases include 80 tons of methanol leaking into the Kanawha river, 900kg of methyl chloride gas, and a phosgene leak that killed a worker at the plant.

Since 2010, DuPont has been working under an EPA administrative order to correct problems that led to these releases, which it says has already cost $6.8 million.


Related Content

DuPont and Monsanto settle Roundup dispute

12 April 2013 Business

news image

Firms drop expensive ongoing litigation in favour of a licensing deal

BP to pay £4.5 billion for disaster

19 November 2012 Business

news image

Company will plead guilty to criminal charges including felony manslaughter

Most Read

Not all science is created equal

16 October 2014 Comments

news image

John Ioannidis explains why researchers should be curious about the differences between disciplines

MDMA

9 October 2014 Podcast | Compounds

news image

The drug that fuelled rave culture may yet be a treatment for PTSD. Hayley Simon introduces MDMA

Most Commented

Cannabis chemists look for professional recognition

16 October 2014 News and Analysis

news image

The American Chemical Society is being petitioned to form a division to help develop standards in the field

Not all science is created equal

16 October 2014 Comments

news image

John Ioannidis explains why researchers should be curious about the differences between disciplines