Falling behind: boom, bust & the global race for scientific talent


Michael S Teitelbaum
2014 | 272pp | £19.95
ISBN: 9781400850143
Reviewed by Deborah Stine

In this book, Michael Teitelbaum indicates the following three core findings:

  • the alarms about widespread shortages or shortfalls in the number of US scientists and engineers are quite inconsistent with nearly all available evidence
  • similar claims of the past were politically successful but resulted in a series of booms and busts that harmed US science and engineering enterprise and made careers in these fields increasingly unattractive
  • clear signs of malaise in the US science and engineering workforce are structural in origin and cannot be cured simply by providing additional funding. To the contrary, recent efforts of this kind have proved to be destabilising, and advocates should be careful what they wish for.

His recommendations for action including identifying sensible ways to moderate future booms and busts in research funding; leveling the playing field of incentives and reducing destabilising feedback; and creating a mechanism to provide objective assessments of career trends and claims of ‘shortages’.

The book provides an interesting history of US science and engineering workforce studies and actions, and sensible recommendations and principles given the ever-changing workforce.

However, it also suffers from a lack of quantitative data, a perspective that is too broad-brushed and pigeonholes science and engineering degree holders into traditional occupations. A better perspective is taking the view that science, technology, engineering and mathematics degrees are today’s ‘liberal arts’ degrees – providing the ability to move among different occupations as personal goals and employer needs change. This is also true of many of the studies Teitelbaum cites.

Readers should consider looking at the quantitative, nuanced data available including a Congressional Research Service 2014 report: The US Science and Engineering Workforce: Recent, Current, and Projected Employment, Wages, and Unemployment and Georgetown University’s Center for Education and Workforce. All of these data show that the science and engineering workforce is doing just fine compared to the workforce as a whole when looking at key factors such as unemployment rate.

What is needed more than the recommendations Teitelbaum makes is better and more nuanced information and guidance for students before and during their education, as well as throughout their career so they can make informed decisions. In the end, do we really want less people trained in science and engineering considering all the economic and societal challenges we face? I think not. We just need to make sure we don’t make false promises.

Purchase Falling behind: boom, bust & the global race for scientific talent from Amazon.co.uk


Related Content

Business roundup

29 May 2009 Business

news image

Industry news, June 2009

Physicist turned politician to head AAAS

5 December 2014 News and Analysis

news image

Retiring Representative Rush Holt will assume the helm of AAAS in February and wants to see US science funding boosted

Most Read

σ meets π for a hole lot of bonding

10 December 2014 Research

news image

Co-operating holes provide unique interaction opportunities

Cutting edge chemistry in 2014

10 December 2014 Research

news image

We take a look back at the year's most interesting chemical science stories

Most Commented

Smart skin for prosthetic limbs senses heat and touch

12 December 2014 Research

news image

Ultra-thin plastic skin can bend and flex without affecting the skin's ability to detect stimuli

Chemistry behind the ‘blue man’ unlocked

1 November 2012 Research

news image

Biochemical model suggests that silver ions, not nanoparticles, cause a rare skin complaint