Photon pinball identifies chemicals from afar


random_laser

Photons bouncing through a powder can create a ‘random laser’, also amplifying Raman scattering © NAS

US scientists have pushed the range at which chemicals can be remotely identified beyond a kilometre by turning the samples themselves into lasers.1 By triggering bright random Raman laser emission, Marlan Scully and Vladislav Yakovlev from Texas A&M University and their team successfully distinguished a series of similar white powders. The system they used cost just $25,000 (£15,000).

‘Even this preliminary proof-of-principle experiment easily outperforms existing techniques in both range and acquisition distance,’ Yakovlev tells Chemistry World.  The approach could enable airborne instruments that measure fertiliser use or spot pollution or explosives, Scully adds.

Analytical chemistry already exploits Raman scattering, where molecules absorb photons and retain part of their energy, therefore emitting a different colour photon. The colour difference can yield valuable information about the material, if a fundamental challenge can be overcome. ‘Only one photon in 10-10 is Raman scattered, so you’ve got to enhance the effect,’ Scully says.

Lasers providing photons in large numbers have helped deliver Raman detection materials from a distance, for example with Scully and Yakovlev’s team identifying anthrax through an envelope.2 Then, earlier this year, Yakovlev’s group adapted still-emerging ‘random laser’ technology to Raman analysis.3

Normal lasers trap photons between mirrors to trigger stimulated emission of photons, multiplying them and leading to powerful light beams. Random lasers have no mirrors, instead shining pump lasers at materials that scatter light, triggering stimulated emission through frantic ‘optical pinball’, with photons bouncing in all directions.

Yakovlev realised that if any of the ‘pinball’ photons had been produced by Raman scattering, a random laser would amplify them too. This makes the production of Raman-scattered photons 100 million times more efficient, he says. His team first proved that by shining a green laser on barium sulfate powder. The powder emitted intense random laser light in all directions, mixing red Raman and green conventional stimulated emissions.

In their latest work, the scientists added a red laser to help collect the detailed Raman information, allowing them to distinguish six inorganic and three organic powders. ‘The green beam is diminished in energy and the red beam enhanced by the Raman transfer of photons,’ Scully explains.

Bernhard Lendl from the Vienna University of Technology in Austria says the technique ‘may well open a new avenue for identification of trace materials at large distances’. ‘It adds potential high sensitivity to the inherent molecular specificity of Raman spectroscopy,’ he says. However, he warns that the technique’s eye safety ‘will require special attention’.


Related Content

Chemistry World podcast - October 2014

3 October 2014 Podcast | Monthly

news image

We speak to Jason Sello about the hunt for new antibiotics, and Monique Simmonds explains the chemical role of botanical gard...

Raman reinvented

26 March 2008 Premium contentFeature

news image

Raman spectroscopy is no longer an insensitive technique. Tom Westgate finds out how this advancing technology offers new pos...

Most Read

Cannabis chemists look for professional recognition

16 October 2014 News and Analysis

news image

The American Chemical Society is being petitioned to form a division to help develop standards in the field

Not all science is created equal

16 October 2014 Comments

news image

John Ioannidis explains why researchers should be curious about the differences between disciplines

Most Commented

Helium happily shares electrons to create dianions

16 October 2014 Research

news image

Fullerene dianions created in nanodroplets of helium opening up new ways of creating exotic molecular species

Not all science is created equal

16 October 2014 Comments

news image

John Ioannidis explains why researchers should be curious about the differences between disciplines