UK science strategy leaves many questions unanswered


The strategy was crafted by science minister Greg Clark in conjunction with the Treasury and the UK's business department © Jayne Russell/Alamy

The government has published its long awaited science and innovation strategy, but many of the questions asked by the science community won’t be answered until the next spending review. The strategy re-iterated capital spending plans set out in the autumn statement, but does not commit to ringfencing the science budget or to increase R&D expenditure in line with competitors.

The government said it recognised that the science base needs ‘adequate resource funding’ not just capital investment, and that R&D spending by departments needed to be prioritised – both of which would be considered in 2015.

Sarah Main, director of the Campaign for Science & Engineering, said the strategy could have been ‘wide-ranging and visionary’ but added that it reflected ‘the reality of where we are in the political cycle’. She said there was much to welcome, but a lot depended on whether it was ‘picked up by the next government or left to gather dust’. Dominic Tildesley, president of the Royal Society of Chemistry, said: ‘To reverse the decades-long decline in UK science funding and create jobs in our knowledge economy, we need politicians now and beyond the next election to grow funding for both facilities and staff. Setting the UK on a trajectory to return government science spend to the EU average of 0.7% of GDP by 2020 would attract private sector R&D investment and boost UK growth.’

The strategy puts emphasis on science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) skills: £67 million is earmarked to train up to 17,500 more STEM teachers over the next parliament and recruit another 2500 specialist maths and physics teachers. More apprenticeships will be delivered by creating national colleges in digital skills, wind energy and advanced manufacturing, with a £5 million pot to support the best candidates. The government said it expected further and higher education to take more account of STEM skills shortages.

It also wants to create another two catapults next year: energy systems and precision medicine, to add to the existing network. How much funding, or where these will be is not specified. There’s also a £30 million commitment for UK involvement in the European x-ray free electron laser project being built near Hamburg, Germany, and £20 million to create an Inspiring Science Capital Fund, to encourage public engagement in science.

A raft of reviews are to be carried out, including efficiencies in universities and making sure that the research councils are investing public money wisely. There’s recognition of the increasingly competitive environment for R&D too, which will mean that the country will need to compete to attract investment and skills, but also build on relationships with new scientific powers like China and South Africa.

Related Content

Dismay and uncertainty in scientific circles after UK votes to leave EU

24 June 2016 News and Analysis

news image

Brexit vote prompts fears over freedom of movement and funding

To leave or not to leave

31 May 2016 Comments

news image

Chris Leigh and Mike Galsworthy discuss their views on the EU referendum

Most Commented

Ethanol to butanol conversion shows sustainable potential

13 January 2016 Research

news image

Borrowed hydrogen chemistry drives reaction to obtain useful fuel from biomass

Injectable foam repairs bones

22 December 2015 Research

news image

Scientists say biomaterial could treat bone defects and diseases