WHO urged to revisit drinking water guidelines


The World Health Organization’s (WHO) drinking water guidelines for nine common toxic chemicals are inadequate and should be re-evaluated, according to a team of researchers led by Bibudhendra Sarkar at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto. The 2011 edition of the WHO’s drinking water quality guidelines were less restrictive for manganese, boron, mercury, molybdenum, nickel, nitrite, selenium and uranium and did not establish a guideline for aluminium.

After examining the agency’s background documents explaining the rationale for the changes, Sarkar’s research team concluded that some of these modifications failed to account for the occurrence of such chemicals in drinking water, or key health studies from the last decade. For example, the scientists suggest that the removal of manganese from the 2011 guidelines is ‘especially worrisome’ because the decision was not grounded in the best science and could harm public health.

Sarkar’s team references the fact that the WHO said it withdrew the 400μg/l drinking water guidelines for manganese because that figure is well above concentrations of the element normally found in drinking water, but the researchers note that manganese has been reported in greater concentrations in over 50 countries. Chronic manganese exposure has been linked to various neurological effects such as learning disabilities in children, Parkinson’s disease and cognitive decline in adults.

Although WHO guidelines are not regulations, they are often used by governments when setting local standards. ‘These are the de facto standards ... especially for developing countries that don’t have their own regulations or regulatory agencies,’ Sarkar tells Chemistry World. ‘On the basis of these facts, the WHO should really take this matter very seriously and re-evaluate the guidelines as soon as possible,’ he adds.

Maryse Bouchard, a global manganese expert at the University of Montreal, agreed. ‘The WHO guidelines should be based on a comprehensive review of the literature including the latest data, produced by the most credible research groups,’ she said. ‘This latest edition of the guidelines contains several limits of drinking water contaminants for which questionable risk analysis decisions were made, hence a re-analysis is needed.’ The WHO’s next drinking water guidelines are not due until 2020.

References

S H Frisbie, E J Mitchell and B Sarkar, Environ. Health (London, UK), 2015, 14:63 (DOI: 10.1186/s12940-015-0050-7)


Related Content

Digging deep for safer water

27 March 2014 Premium contentFeature

news image

Arsenic-laced water is still poisoning millions of people in Asia. Nina Notman looks to see if an end is in sight

Chemistry World podcast - October 2013

2 October 2013 Podcast | Monthly

news image

Chemists are helping palaeontologists discover the palette of fossil pigments, and helping toxicologists design greener compo...

Most Commented

Beyond element 118: the next row of the periodic table

29 January 2016 News and Analysis

news image

A technological leap may be called for to expand the number of elements in existence

New German excellence strategy gets political go-ahead

21 June 2016 News and Analysis

news image

Scheme will provide €500 million to bolster country’s best universities and fund best research