Lords call for research funding clarity
07 April 2010
The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee has called on the UK government to clarify its current research funding commitments, and the periods of time over which they will apply. It has concluded there is a lack of oversight of the total research spend, making it difficult for the government to make 'coherent, well-founded decisions' about the use of public funds to support research.
Lord Sutherland has called for greater clarity on research funding commitments
© Press Association
There is a particular problem when funding comes from more than one government department or agency. The committee believes this would be best addressed by taking a wider view to identify major cross-department policy issues, and then coordinate and fund responses to these grand challenges facing society.
'Clearly, in times of economic uncertainty, decisions about how to allocate public funds are especially complex,' says Lord Sutherland, the committee's chairman. 'The recommendations in our report are intended to help ensure the government is well placed to make informed and effective research funding decisions, and that robust mechanisms exist so decisions on research funding are based on the best available advice.'
Although David Lammy, higher education and intellectual property minister, has said a Labour government would see through its commitments under the science and innovation investment framework until 2014, the plans of the Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties are, as yet, unclear. 'According to the budget forecast, this would mean that the science budget would rise by at least 3 per cent from 2011,' says Nick Dusic, director of the Campaign for Science and Engineering (Case). 'The opposition parties need to state if they will match this commitment, or develop a new long-term framework.'
He adds that, at this time of constrained public expenditure, it is important to strengthen the evidence base to inform research funding decisions. 'It would be unwise to cut part of the funding system without understanding the political consequences,' he says. 'Case recommends the next government appoints a Treasury chief scientific adviser to lead a cross-government research programme on the science of science policy.'
Interesting? Spread the word using the 'tools' menu on the left.
Also of interest
25 March 2010
Science and industry are offered a glimmer of hope in the latest UK budget
18 March 2010
£7.4 billion distributed for teaching and research at universities in England, but uncertainties and anxiety remain
09 March 2010
Researchers and former science ministers warn UK government of 'decades of slow economic decline' unless science receives heavy investment
Comment on this story at the Chemistry World blog
Read other posts and join in the discussion
External links will open in a new browser window