RSC - Advancing the Chemical Sciences


Chemistry World

 

Predicting nanoparticle toxicity


26 July 2010

Judging nanoparticle toxicity could be made easier by a new theoretical model that predicts which materials will make nanoparticles that could damage living cells. The model should enable regulators to streamline and prioritise nanotoxicology testing.

There is currently little experimental toxicity data on the vast range of available nanoparticles, and it is difficult to measure toxicity directly in any way that allows correlation with the properties of particular materials.

Enrico Burello and Andrew Worth from the systems toxicology unit at the European Commission's Joint Research Centre in Ispra, Italy, therefore decided to put together a predictive model to help fill this gap. 'We have shown that it is possible to take a more rational approach to assessing nanoparticles,' says Burello, 'and to make links between the toxicologists and modellers.'

Nanoparticles

Nanoparticle use is growing faster than toxicology can keep up, so a model could help streamline and prioritise research

 

The model can predict the available electronic energy levels in the nanoparticle structure, and match them up with the oxidation potentials of reactions that would either remove antioxidants from cells or generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) like hydrogen peroxide or superoxide ions (O2-). Where these two values overlap, it means that the nanoparticles can accept electrons in these processes and cause oxidative stress in cells - either by eliminating antioxidants or producing ROS.

The team's results correlate well with known toxicity data, for example titanium dioxide nanoparticles are known to produce oxidative stress and the model predicted them to have the right energy levels to do so. However, Burello, stresses that so far the model only incorporates one mechanism of toxicity. 'We focused on oxidative stress because it's quite well known and an important mechanism of action,' he says, adding that they are now trying to build in other factors such as ions leaching from the particles, interactions with proteins and lipid membranes. 'For each one we're starting to identify the correlated properties and build up a mechanism of action.'

'This is a good first attempt at constructing a quantitative structure-activity relationship for nanoparticles,' says Ken Donaldson, a nanotoxicology expert from the University of Edinburgh, UK. 'Toxicology takes a long time, and these materials are marching ahead in terms of their use and potential for human exposure,' he explains, adding that any model that would allow materials to be grouped together in some kind of banding system would provide a useful practical guide to help protect people handling nanoparticles.

 

Phillip Broadwith


Interesting? Spread the word using the 'tools' menu on the left.

References

E Burello and A P Worth, Nanotoxicology, 2010, DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2010.502980

Also of interest

Nano safety

Slack nano safety

31 January 2010

Many researchers working with nanomaterials use inadequate protection, if any at all, claims new study


Nano in food

Lords call for clarity over nanotech in food

12 January 2010

Report urges research into safety of nanomaterials and criticises food industry for lack of transparency


Nano or not nano?

All that is small is not nano

14 September 2009

Researchers suggest doing away with traditional definition of a nanoparticle to provide a focus for environmental, health and safety studies, and future regulation


Nanoparticles

Finding the risks of nanoparticle exposure

09 March 2009

New model for nanoparticle lung exposure sheds new light on possible health risks


Related Links

Link icon Comment on this story at the Chemistry World blog
Read other posts and join in the discussion


External links will open in a new browser window