Matthew S. Tremblay and Dalibor Sames*
Department of Chemistry, Columbia University, 3000 Broadway, New York, NY 10027, USA. E-mail: sames@chem.columbia.edu; Fax: +1 212-932-1289; Tel: +1 212-854-7108
A modular synthetic method for the differential incorporation of two lanthanide ions into a single molecular scaffold is reported; the mixed bimetallic Tb/Eu complex displays an interesting solvent polarity-dependent ratiometric luminescence.
The utility of lanthanide chelates as luminescent probes and magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agents in biological systems is well established.1 The sharp emission bands of Tb3+ and Eu3+ occur in a useful wavelength domain (500700 nm) and often have lifetimes in the order of a few milliseconds. Although direct excitation of the metal center leads to forbidden transitions, sensitization via energy transfer from an appended
antenna
occurs readily with a variety of organic chromophores, including the aromatic amino acids tyrosine and tryptophan.2 The highly paramagnetic Gd3+ ion is used frequently in MR imaging applications owing to its ability to provide image contrast by decreasing the T1 relaxation time of nearby water molecules.3 Responsive lanthanide probes capable of sensing analyte binding or enzymatic activity have been developed for both the luminescent4 and magnetic modes.5
The toxicity of lanthanide aqua ions makes their residence in a soluble chelate obligatory for biological applications. In addition, inner sphere water molecules can be detrimental to Tb3+ and Eu3+ luminescence quantum efficiency due to the strong coupling of OH vibrations. Fulfilment of the high coordination requirements (79) of the lanthanides is typically accomplished using the water-soluble polyaminocarboxylates 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N
,N
,N
-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and 1,1,4,7,7-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA),6 although several other motifs have been studied.7 As a result of their popularity, several methods for the preparation of DOTA and DTPA bioconjugates are available.8
The incorporation of two different lanthanide ions into a single probe molecule may afford interesting properties, in either a dual-emissive (Tb3+ and Eu3+) or bimodal (Eu3+/Tb3+ and Gd3+) context.7b Although several lanthanide-containing heterometallic complexes have been prepared by exploiting differences in ligand preference between lanthanides and other transition metals,7b,9 the minute differences in coordination behavior10 across the lanthanide periodparticularly the immediate neighbors Eu3+, Gd3+ and Tb3+severely limit the synthesis of heterometallic bis-lanthanide complexes. To the best of our knowledge, there is only one example of a discretely synthesized heterometallic complex with two different lanthanide ions,11 though other complexes containing two different lanthanide ions have been prepared and studied as components of statistical mixtures.7b,12
As part of a broad program aimed at sensing chemical and enzymatic events with fluorescent13 and luminescent14 probes, we wanted to develop a modular synthetic strategy for the differential incorporation of two lanthanide ions into a single molecular scaffold, preferably using the stable, soluble, and readily bioconjugatable DOTA and DTPA chelates. Although the two chelates are almost indistinguishable thermodynamically,10,15 only the acyclic DTPA chelate is prone to kinetic dissociation.7a,10,16 We postulated that the sequential, differential complexation of a molecule containing both DOTA and DTPA chelates could be accomplished by capitalizing on this difference in decomplexation rates (Fig. 1). Specifically, treatment of DOTA/DTPA bis-chelate 1 with an excess of LnA3+ should result in homobimetallic complex 2, which could be prompted to undergo selective kinetic dissociation (e.g. acid-promoted demetallation) to give the corresponding monometallic species 3. Further complexation of this complex with LnB3+ should yield the pure heterobimetallic complex 4. A conceptually similar approach has been used elegantly by Horrocks, Jr. et al. to study the distances between calcium binding sites in proteins.17 The proposed sequential, differential metallation may represent a more general approach than a previously reported method,11 since it obviates the need to couple metallated fragments.
![]() |
||
| Fig. 1 Schematic representation of the sequential, differential metallation of a DOTA/DPTA bis-chelate with two different lanthanide ions (LnA3+ and LnB3+). | ||
The branched tetrapeptide-based DOTA/DTPA bis-chelate 5 was prepared via standard solid phase peptide synthesis on Rink Amide AM resin using the orthogonally-protected diamino acid Fmoc-Dpr(Mtt)-OH for the selective introduction of the DOTA(tBu)3 and DTPA(tBu)4 units (Scheme 1). After cleavage and global deprotection, the crude peptide 5 was purified by reverse phase HPLC (RP-HPLC) and complexed with excess Tb3+ in pH 5 triethylammonium acetate buffer. When analyzed by RP-HPLC using a H2O/MeCN eluent system buffered with 0.1% TFA, the crude mixture contained a single major peak, which was isolated by preparative RP-HPLC and identified by mass spectrometry as the mono-Tb3+ species 6, containing only a trace amount of the corresponding bis-Tb3+ species. The TFA-promoted dissociation of Tb:DTPA complexes during preparative HPLC has been noted by others4b and found by us to be nearly quantitative. Following the isolation of 6, complexation with Eu3+ or Gd3+ took place quantitatively in unbuffered aqueous media; the resulting heterobimetallic complexes 7 and 8 could be used directly for photophysical measurements.6 This simple protocol permits the rational design and synthesis of heterobimetallic complexes containing any pair of lanthanide metals, making available new probes and bioconjugates with potentially interesting properties and applications.
![]() |
||
| Scheme 1 Synthesis of the branched tetrapeptide ligand DOTA-Dpr(DTPA)-TrpNH2 (5) and its sequential, differential metallation, producing the heterometallated bis-lanthanide complexes 7 and 8. | ||
The steady state emission spectra of 6, 7 and 8 in water are shown in Fig. 2a. As expected, a portion of the energy absorbed by the tryptophan residue is emitted as fluorescence (
max = 390 nm)
and a portion is transferred to the 5D4 state of Tb3+ (E = 20
400 cm1), resulting in sensitized luminescence (
max = 487, 544, 585 and 620 nm) from the Tb:DOTA moiety. Although the Tb:DOTA and Eu:DTPA chelates are most likely at similar distances from the tryptophan sensitizer in 7, the triplet energy of tryptophan is too high to efficiently populate the emissive 5D0 state of Eu3+ (E = 17
200 cm1) and no sensitized Eu3+ luminescence is expected to be observed.1,17 However, careful comparison of 6 and 7 reveals a small shoulder at 613 nm in the spectrum of 7 but not in the spectrum of 6. This emission corresponds to the 5D0
7F2 transition of Eu3+. This shoulder was more pronounced in less polar solvents, such as tert-butanol (Fig. 2b). The luminescence properties of 6 and 7 were compared in a series of alcohol solvents, and the Eu3+ emission band increased at the expense of Tb3+ emission as the polarity of the solvent was decreased, allowing ratiometric measurement of the relative solvent polarity (Fig. 2c).
![]() |
||
| Fig. 2 (a) Emission spectra of compounds 6, 7 and 8 in H2O. (b) Emission spectra of 7 in H2O and in tert-butanol. (c) The Eu/Tb emission ratio dependence on solvent polarity of 6 and 7. | ||
This polarity-sensitive emission could be the result of several factors. The first is deactivation of the Tb3+ excited state via energy transfer to Eu3+, which, although it has limited precedent, is known to be efficient.7b The second scenario involves ratiometric proportioning of the tryptophan excited state energy directly to Eu3+ in addition to Tb3+; a control compound containing only an Eu3+ chelate and tryptophan exhibited similar solvent-dependent sensitized luminescence, albeit significantly weaker.§ A third possibility is direct excitation of the Eu3+ chelate, but this has been ruled out by control studies.§ The precise nature of this ratiometric emission and its potential applications to polarity sensing are under investigation. Since both Tb3+ and Eu3+ have long radiative lifetimes and luminesce at relatively long wavelengths, this is the first system that would provide a ratiometric measurement where both components are outside of the frequency as well as the time domain of cellular autofluorescence.
In summary, a novel synthetic route to heterometallic bis-lanthanide complexes via sequential, differential metallation has been presented. Complex 7, containing Tb3+ and Eu3+, exhibits ratiometric luminescence as a function of solvent polarity and may provide a useful platform for time-resolved polarity sensing.
Financial support for this work was provided by the G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Foundation. Marlin Halim is gratefully acknowledged for her intellectual and editorial support.
| 1 | D. Parker, R. S. Dickins, H. Puschmann, C. Crossland and J. A. K. Howard, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 19772010 [Links]. | |
| 2 | (a) J. P. MacManus, C. W. Hogue, B. J. Marsden, M. Sikorska and A. G. Szabo, J. Biol. Chem., 1990, 265, 1035810366 [Links]; (b) F. S. Richardson, Chem. Rev., 1982, 82, 541552 [Links]. | |
| 3 | (a) A. E. Merbach and E. Tóth, The Chemistry of Contrast Agents in Medical Magnetic Resonance Imaging, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York, 2001 |
|
| 4 | (a) T. Gunnlaugsson and J. P. Leonard, Chem. Commun., 2005, 31143131 [Links]; (b) K. Lee, V. Dzubeck, L. Latshaw and J. P. Schneider, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 1361613617 [Links]. | |
| 5 | (a) T. A. Moats, S. E. Fraser and T. J. Meade, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 726728 [Links]; (b) W.-H. Li, S. E. Fraser and T. J. Meade, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 14131414 [Links]; (c) S. Aime, D. D. Castelli and E. Terreno, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 93649365 [Links]; (d) M. Woods, G. E. Kiefer, S. Bott, A. Castillo-Muzquiz, C. Eshelbrenner, L. Michaudet, K. McMillan, S. D. K. Mudigunda, D. Ogrin, G. Tircsó, S. Zhang, P. Zhao and A. D. Sherry, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 92489256 [Links]; (e) J. A. Duimstra, F. J. Femia and T. J. Meade, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 1284712855 [Links]. | |
| 6 | M. Li and P. R. Selvin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 81328138 [Links]. | |
| 7 | For reviews, see: (a) V. Alexander, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 273342 [Links]; (b) C. Piguet and J.-C. G. Bünzli, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1999, 28, 347358 [Links]; (c) For a recent example, see: S. Petoud, S. M. Cohen, J.-C. G. Bünzli and K. N. Raymond, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 1332413325 [Links]. | |
| 8 | For monoreactive DOTA, see: (a) M. Oliver, M. R. Jorgensen and A. D. Miller, Synlett, 2004, 3, 453456 |
|
| 9 | (a) J.-P. Costes, F. Dahan, A. Dupuis and J.-P. Laurent, Chem.Eur. J., 1998, 4, 16161620 [Links]; (b) P. Guerriero, S. Tamburini and P. A. Vigato, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1995, 139, 17243 [Links]; (c) A. Beeby, R. S. Dickins, S. FitzGerald, L. J. Govenlock, C. L. Maupin, D. Parker, J. P. Riehl, G. Siligardi and J. A. G. Williams, Chem. Commun., 2000, 11831184 [Links]. | |
| 10 | For example, log K for Eu3+:DTPA and Gd3+:DTPA is 22.4 and 22.5, respectively: G. Anderegg, F. Arnaud-Neu, R. Delgado, J. Felcman and K. Popov, Pure Appl. Chem., 2005, 77, 14451495 [Links]. | |
| 11 | S. Faulkner and S. J. A. Pope, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 1052610527 [Links]. | |
| 12 | (a) J.-C. G. Bünzli, P. Froidevaux and C. Piguet, New J. Chem., 1995, 19, 661665 [Links]; (b) F. Tanaka and T. Ishibashi, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1996, 92, 11051110 [Links]; (c) F. Avecilla, A. de Blas, R. Bastida, D. E. Fenton, J. Mahia, A. Macias, C. Platas, A. Rodriguez and T. Rodriguez-Blas, Chem. Commun., 1999, 125126 [Links]. | |
| 13 | (a) D. J. Yee, V. Balsanek and D. Sames, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 22822283 [Links]; (b) G. Chen, D. J. Yee, N. G. Gubernator and D. Sames, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 45444545 [Links]; (c) M. S. Tremblay and D. Sames, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 24172420 [Links]; (d) M. K. Froemming and D. Sames, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 637642 [Links]. | |
| 14 | M. S. Tremblay, Q. Zhu, A. A. Martí, J. Dyer, M. Halim, S. Jockusch, N. J. Turro and D. Sames, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 27232726 [Links]. | |
| 15 | A. Bianchi, L. Calabi, L. Ferrini, P. Losi, F. Uggeri and B. Valtancoli, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1996, 249, 1315 [Links]. | |
| 16 | (a) A. Heppeler, S. Froidevaux, H. R. Mäcke, F. Jermann, M. Béhé, P. Powell and M. Hennig, Chem.Eur. J., 1999, 5, 19741981 [Links]; (b) M. Boiocchi, M. Bonizzoni, L. Fabbrizzi, F. Foti, M. Licchelli, A. Poggi, A. Taglietti and M. Zema, Chem.Eur. J., 2004, 10, 32093216 [Links]. | |
| 17 | (a) W. DeW. Horrocks, Jr. and D. R. Sudnick, Acc. Chem. Res., 1981, 14, 384392 [Links]; (b) M.-J. Rhee, D. R. Sudnick, V. K. Arkle and W. DeW. Horrocks, Jr., Biochemistry, 1981, 20, 33283334 [Links]. |
|
|
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006 |