Additions and corrections
Syntheses and photophysical properties of new iminopyrrolyl boron complexes and their application in efficient single-layer non-doped OLEDs prepared by spin coating
D. Suresh, Clara S. B. Gomes, Pedro T. Gomes, Roberto E. Di Paolo, António L. Maçanita, Maria José Calhorda, Ana Charas, Jorge Morgado and M. Teresa Duarte
Dalton Trans., 2012, 41, 8502–8505 (DOI: 10.1039/C2DT30487B). Amendment published 5th December 2012.
In the manuscript, in addition to the corrections outlined in the previous amendment (published 31st October 2012), the entries for the εmax of compounds 4-6 are incorrect. The correct Table 1 is as follows:
Table 1 Wavelength maximum of the first absorption band (λmaxabs) and respective
molar extinction coefficient (εmax),
wavelength of the first vibronic emission transition
(λ0–0em), fluorescence quantum yield (ϕf), lifetime (τf)
and rate constant (kf) and sum of
non-radiative rate constants (knr)
of boron complexes 4–6, in THF at 293 K. Ionization potential (IP) and
electron affinity (EA) values, as determined by cyclic voltammetry, and DFT
calculated HOMO and LUMO energies, are also shown
Syntheses and photophysical properties of new iminopyrrolyl boron complexes and their application in efficient single-layer non-doped OLEDs prepared by spin coating
D. Suresh, Clara S. B. Gomes, Pedro T. Gomes, Roberto E. Di Paolo, António L. Maçanita, Maria José Calhorda, Ana Charas, Jorge Morgado and M. Teresa Duarte
Dalton Trans., 2012, 41, 8502-8505 (DOI: 10.1039/C2DT30487B). Updated Amendment published 31st October 2012.
In the manuscript the entry for the HOMO of
compound 4 and the entries for the IP of compounds 5 and 6 in Table 1 are
incorrect. The correct Table 1 is as follows:
Table 1 Wavelength maximum of the first absorption band (λmaxabs) and respective
molar extinction coefficient (εmax),
wavelength of the first vibronic emission transition
(λ0–0em), fluorescence quantum yield (ϕf), lifetime (τf)
and rate constant (kf) and sum of
non-radiative rate constants (knr)
of boron complexes 4–6, in THF at 293 K. Ionization potential (IP) and
electron affinity (EA) values, as determined by cyclic voltammetry, and DFT
calculated HOMO and LUMO energies, are also shown
Additionally, the sentence of text on page 8504 from line 49 to line 53 of the left-hand column of the manuscript is incorrect. The correct text is as follows:
LEDs based on 4 show a poor performance, which can be attributed to its lower fluorescence efficiency and, possibly, a low electron/hole balance within the emissive layer (Fig. S10 and S12, ESI†). We note that no significant differences are expected to exist between the three complexes in what concerns electron and hole injection.
A revised version of the ESI for c2dt30487b was also published on the 31st of October 2012, in which revised versions of Fig. S9 and S12 and a replacement caption for Fig. S12 were included.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
Back to article