Our recent work in this area
Our joint response to the National Improvement Framework for Scottish Education
We responded as part of the Learned Societies' Group on Scottish Science Education to the Scottish Government's proposals for a National Improvement Framework (NIF). The response highlighted that the NIF could potentially have negative implications for teaching science.
Our response to the HEFCE Quality Assessment Review for Future Approaches to Quality Assessment in England, Wales and Northern Ireland
We broadly supported the need to change the current system of quality assurance, but expressed a number of concerns over specific details and the implementation of the proposals. We highlighted our support for autonomy of HE institutions, but raised concerns around the suggested mechanisms for consistency across different disciplines at different institutions.
Changes to the assessment of A-levels in the sciences: What do they mean for higher education admissions?
Our guide explains how those working in higher education admissions can help ensure students receive a rich practical experience at A-level in light of the changes to practical assessment.
Response to the Ofqual consultation on GCSE reform: regulations for science
We questioned the percentages allocated to mathematical skills in the assessment of the different sciences and requested clarification on the measures to ensure students have opportunities to undertake sufficient practical work.
Response to the Ofqual consultation on the assessment of practical work in the sciences at GCSE
We supported the need to change the current system of assessment but expressed a number of concerns over the implementation of the proposals including appropriate monitoring and the lack of detail provided in the consultation document.
Response to the Department for Education consultation on new performance descriptors for key stages 1 and 2
The response supported one 'working at the national standard' level in science but called for the guidance to encourage teachers to allow greater depth of study within the same key stage. It also highlighted the need for the purposes of the performance descriptors to be more explicit and for the language of the descriptors to be redrafted to mirror that of the National Curriculum.
Response to the Ofqual consultation on Completing GCSE, AS and A-Level reform
The response highlighted our support for subject curriculum committees independent of interest and free from competition, and the need to emphasise understanding and competencies over content.
Response to the Ofqual consultation on Setting the Grade Standards of new GCSEs in England
Our response included a call for a clearer definition of the purpose of key stage 4 examinations, and we opposed the emphasis placed on assessment as an accountability measure used for league table performance comparisons.
Response to the Ofqual consultation on Regulating Endorsement and Examiner-Author Conflicts
We stated that relationships between awarding organisations (AOs) and publishers contained real risks in a system where multiple competing awarding organisations exist. The response called for one single AO, external accreditation of revision guides and a ban on current textbook authors acting as examiners.
Response to the Ofqual consultation on A-level Regulatory requirements
The response called for the assessment and content of the proposed A-Levels to be developed more coherently and for Ofqual to reconsider the proposal to separate the practical grade from the overall A-level science grades.
Response to the Department for Education consultation on A-level subject content in the sciences
Appendices to the main response
We called for the implementation of the A-levels to be delayed and for greater coherence in the reform process. The response also commented on practical science, content, assessment, working scientifically, big ideas in science and mathematical skills.
Read more about how we have involved the chemistry community in the development of the science curriculum and in changes to the assessment of the sciences in England