Popular searches

Donate Join us

Natural Product Reports Emerging Investigator Lectureship

Recognising exceptional contributions from early career researchers in a natural products-related area of the chemical sciences.

Details

Status Closed
Nominator eligibility Anyone
Nominee location Global
Career stage Early career

About this lectureship

This lectureship celebrates outstanding early career researchers who have made significant contributions to a natural product related area of the chemical sciences in their independent research careers.

  • It is presented annually
  • The nominations are shortlisted, and the winner is selected by a judging panel made up of the Natural Product Reports Editorial Board
  • The recipient of this lectureship receives the opportunity to present at a relevant high-profile international meeting with a contribution of up to £500 to cover associated costs

View this journal

Winners

Fidele Ntie-Kang, University of Buea

For making a significant contribution to a natural product related area of the chemical sciences in their independent research careers.

Previous winners

Guidelines for nominators and candidates

Find out who is eligible for this lectureship, about the nomination process and see who is on the selection panel.

The Natural Products Reports Emerging Investigator Lectureship is awarded through a process whereby nominations of candidates are invited from our community.

The NPR Lectureship is open to all researchers throughout the world. This includes, but is not limited to, members of the Royal Society of Chemistry, and researchers in academia or industry.

As part of the Royal Society of Chemistry, we believe we have a responsibility to promote inclusivity and accessibility to improve diversity. Where possible, we encourage each nominator to consider nominating candidates of all genders, races, and backgrounds.

To be eligible for the NPR Lectureship, the candidate must:

  • Be an active natural products researcher, either in academia or industry, carrying out research that is within scope of the journal
  • Be an independent researcher (this includes Research Associates or Fellows who run their own research group; PhD students and postdocs are not eligible)
  • Be at an early stage of their independent career (this should typically be within 12 years of completing their PhD, but appropriate consideration will be given to those who have taken a career break, followed a different career path or work in systems where their time period to independence may vary).

Nominations can be made by anyone and must be sent via email to the Editorial Office by 14 October 2024. Self-nominations are not permitted. All nominators will be asked to confirm that, to the best of their knowledge, their nominee’s professional standing is such that there is no confirmed or potential impediment to them receiving the Lectureship.

To nominate a candidate, please provide:

  • The name, affiliation, website URL and contact details of the nominee
  • An up-to-date nominee CV (three pages maximum)
  • A letter of recommendation (500-word limit) addressing the following assessment criteria:
    • Scientific quality of research output
    • Innovation
    • Community and advocacy activities
    • Additional indicators of esteem may be included for consideration by the judging panel
    • Statements as to why a nominee is eligible if they are beyond twelve years of their PhD completion, for instance, due to career breaks, will not count towards this word limit
  • Contact details for a confirmed supporting referee

Please inform your referee of the nomination that the Editorial Office will request a supporting letter of recommendation (500-word limit) once the nomination has been received, where the referee should comment in detail on specific contributions, achievements and potential. Referees must state their relationship with the nominee e.g. this could be the nominee’s postdoc or PhD supervisor, line manager, project manager or academic mentor.

All eligible nominated candidates will be assessed by a judging panel made up of the Natural Product Reports Editorial Board.

The judging panel will consider the following core criteria:

  • Scientific quality of research output
  • Innovation
  • Community and advocacy activities

Additional indicators of esteem will be considered by the judging panel where multiple nominees are judged equally meritorious in relation to these core criteria.