Beilby Medal and Prize

Guidelines for nominators

• The 2023 Beilby Medal and Prize is administered by SCI. Please visit the SCI website for more information.
• Both RSC members and non-members can nominate for this prize
• Nominees are permitted to nominate themselves
• Nominees can only be considered for one of our Research & Innovation Prizes in any given year. In a case where a nominee is nominated for more than one prize independently, RSC staff will ask the nominee which prize they would like to be considered for.
• Individuals named in any of the following roles during the nomination and judging period are not eligible to nominate or be nominated:
  
  • Materials Chemistry Prize Committee members
  • RSC Subject Community Presidents
  • RSC Prize Committee members
  • Trustees of the Royal Society of Chemistry

• The award is open to nominees based in the UK or internationally
• Nominees should be an early career scientist, typically with no more than 10 years of full-time equivalent professional experience
• This should be experience gained as part of a scientific career excluding time spent in full-time education. Time spent as a postgraduate student should not be included e.g. Masters, PhD. Time spent as a post-doctoral researcher should be included
• Nominators will be asked to provide details of the nominee's professional experience, in relation to the above criteria
• Career breaks will be recognised, and applications are particularly encouraged from those whose career has spanned a break due to caring responsibilities or personal circumstances e.g. a period of parental/adoption leave, family commitments, illness, or other exceptional circumstances
• When nominating previous RSC Prize winners, please remember that a person cannot be awarded twice for substantially the same body of work               

To make a nomination, please use our online nominations system to submit the following information:

• Your name and contact details
• Your nominee's name and contact details
• An up to date CV for the nominee (no longer than one A4 side, 11pt text) which should include a summary of their education and career, and a maximum of 5 relevant publications or patents
• A short citation describing what the nominee should be awarded for. This must be no longer than 250 characters (including spaces) and no longer than one sentence
• A supporting statement (up to 750 words) addressing the selection criteria
• A statement (up to 100 words) describing how your nominee has contributed more broadly to the scientific community. A list of possible examples is outlined in the ‘selection criteria’ tab.
• The name and contact details of two referees. Please inform your referees of the nomination; the system will contact them as soon as their details are submitted. The referees can be the nominee's post-doc or PhD supervisor, line manager, project manager or mentor
• References should be a maximum of 750 words. Referees will be asked to state their relationship (if any) with the nominee and note any conflicts of interest
• References must be submitted through the online system by the nomination deadline, 18 January, 17:00 GMT. Nominations will not go forward to judging without two completed references. Please ensure you submit your referee's details on the system well in advance of this deadline, to allow them sufficient opportunity to provide their reference

The RSC reserves the right to rescind any prize if there are reasonable grounds to do so. All nominators will be asked to confirm that to the best of their knowledge there is no impediment, relating to professional conduct, to their nominee receiving this prize. All prize winners will be asked to sign the RSC’s Code of Conduct Declaration for Recognition.

Selection Criteria and Judging Panel

Our selection committees base their evaluations primarily on the overall quality of relevant contributions made by nominees and not on quantitative measures. The scientific content of any supporting publications, as described in the supporting statement, is much more important than publication metrics or the identity of the journal in which it is published.

The selection committee will consider the following aspects of nominations for this prize:

• Originality of research
• Impact of research
• Quality of publications and/or patents and/or software
• Innovation
• Professional standing
• Independence
• Collaborations and teamwork
• Other indicators of esteem indicated by the nominator/referees

In an instance where multiple nominees are judged equally meritorious in relation to the above criteria, judging panels have the flexibility to use information provided by the nominator on the nominee’s broader contribution to the chemistry community as an additional criterion.

Examples of relevant contributions could include, but are not limited to:

• Involvement with Royal Society of Chemistry member groups/networks
• Teaching/demonstrating
• Effective mentorship
• Service on boards, committees or panels
• Leadership in the scientific community
• Peer-reviewer
• Promotion of diversity and inclusion
• Advocacy for chemistry
• Public engagement and outreach

The prize will be judged by representatives from IOM3, SCI and the RSC (Materials Chemistry Division Prize Committee)

Materials Chemistry Prize Committee

• Magda Titirici, Imperial College London (Chair)
• Rachel Evans, University of Cambridge
• Marina Freitag, Newcastle University
• Andrew Goodwin, University of Oxford
• Manuel Salmeron-Sanchez, University of Glasgow
• David Scanlon, University College London